1.
You’re talking to yourself. Narrators do this in
books, therefore if you’re talking to yourself, you’re the narrator.
2.
If you appear to be the only one talking to
yourself, that must mean the story is about you. If the drooling guy on the
corner is talking to himself, too, the story must also be about him. First
person multiple means you share.
3.
You should never write in second person. Or be
hypocritical.
4.
Maybe you should ponder not using some words
that could be kind of passive. Where in all of that kind of vagueness is the
character who is now hard to find because of the sort of ambiguity?
5.
When a writer uses third person limited, s/he
will often give us one (and only one) character’s thoughts. “Don’t give us two,”
the author thought, as Kristen simultaneously thought she agreed.
6.
Don’t refer to yourself in the third person. It’s
weird.
7.
When thou choosest the omniscience of person the
third, one needn’t sound antique. Exemplifying thy choice stands the Bible and
literature of the century of our Lord 19th, however thy word choice
needn’t likewise exemplify.
8.
The writer SHOULD pick a character we LIKE to
tell the STORY. The reader doesn’t WANT a character that gets on your NERVES –like
a narrator with a NERVOUS TWITCH or a narrator who SHOUTS ALL the TIME!
9.
um, readers also don’t like, um, really boring
narrators who are, um, meek and normal who, um, end up being super boring and,
um, say the same stuff all the time, um, and don’t really do anything.
10.
Ultimately, there needs to be a reason why your
character is in the story and why you chose that particular point of view. For
an example of a point of view that works for only that perfect kind of story,
check out “Orientation” by Daniel Orozco, or click here:
http://nomrad.files.wordpress.com/2007/07/orientation.pdf
http://nomrad.files.wordpress.com/2007/07/orientation.pdf
No comments:
Post a Comment