I’m assembling a reading list for one of my classes when I
had that moment that every writer fears –okay, every writer who teaches fears:
I have only read a few books in the last few months. How disappointing.
This comes on the same day that I actually stopped reading a
book. I have -or had- this firm belief that a writer should always
finish reading every book that he/she starts. After all, a writer empathizes
with another writer. A writer can devote 300 pages to seeing where another
writer came from, and a writer can have the commitment to supporting another
writer by respecting what the other writer sacrificed for and struggled
with.
I’ve changed my mind.
I knew it was going to be a trashy novel when I started it,
and that’s exactly what I wanted to start the semester with, considering that
as a colleague and I just said yesterday, we’re still “stunned” by the ending
of the semester. I wanted to read
trash. But apparently I have limits.
I don’t really want to tell you what book was trash because
my goal isn’t to destroy another writer. Another firm belief of mine is that
you should make up your own mind regarding what you read.
But I do want to convey this to you: read bad books,
especially if you’re a writer. While I’m taking this book off of my Steampunk
reading list for the semester (I don’t want my students to read this and think
that it’s an example of what they should be doing), I think it’s great for
writers to read books with bad writing. You can catch every adverb, every
moment of sensationalized overreaction, every moment of slow pacing, and so
much more. You can see that what your creative writing teachers and mentor said
is true.
Do it. Go and read a good bad book. And learn something.
No comments:
Post a Comment